India’s 2070 net-zero ambitions include policies that prioritise the decoupling of economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions. Our updated ‘intended nationally determined contribution’ (NDC) goals have set a framework for a low carbon emission pathway for the country, while simultaneously focussing on sustainable development goals. To usher in low emissions growth pathways, India requires huge amounts of green finance to fund mitigation and adaptation efforts. According to Standard Chartered Bank’s recent study, emerging markets require an additional $98.4 trillion to transition to net zero. India, by itself, is expected to require $17.7 trillion above the already allocated public capital to fund the long-term efforts to cut emissions. Of this massive amount, a financing gap of $12.4 trillion exists, which India will look to developed markets for. Intimidating as this financing gap may be, we cannot afford to wait for green finance from across international borders. So, how do we begin to address this massive financing gap? What can we do to prevent it from hindering technological innovation and, at the same time, bolster hope for additional climate finance? We start with philanthropic capital that is flexible enough to be spent on various interventions – from roadmaps and research to on-ground implementation – and is not constrained as public capital. It can also catalyse innovation and unlock more finance from the public and private sectors. Several philanthropists have cultivated expertise across development sectors in India, such as education, healthcare and disaster management. While they are starting to invest in climate solutions, Indian philanthropists tend to be drawn towards adaptation efforts that align with legacy sectors, such as working with communities to increase water storage, or smallholder farmers towards crop diversification. In addition to these critical developmental challenges, we also need to direct more funds towards mitigation to meet India’s net zero goals. It is clear that funding for adaptation and mitigation must progress together, and philanthropists can encourage the required innovation for mitigation as well. As we look at reducing the emissions intensity of our economy, we would need to focus on mitigation efforts that will help us reduce the dependence on fossil fuels for energy and industry, while improving land-based carbon sequestration, among others. The government has focussed on cleaning the power sector and improving material and energy efficiency. We need to supplement the government’s endeavours to de-carbonise the hard-to-abate sectors. Illustratively, the chemicals sector is among the largest GHG industry emitters after the steel and cement sectors. The chemical industry uses fossil fuels as raw material and fuel feedstock. To offset the high growth outlook impact on GHG, emissions intensity reduction targets based on science-based target setting and technological innovation is the need of the hour.